Re: Comparing thin client solutions
Chris Gianelloni <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:45:19 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.pxes.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Gentoo Linux |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--=-0W/ng8J1A65eHpNLJvqL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 01:49 -0200, Matheus Leite wrote: > Hello people I am beginning evaluating thin client solutions and the > most promising so far seem to be PXES and LTSP. >=20 > I hope I can find someone here to help me understand the differences > between PXES and LTSP, and in what circumstances should one pick one > or the other. I understand that PXES doesn't use NFS share, is that > all? How dows this affect performance compared to LTSP? What are the > other differences? >=20 > Also, could someone tell me some thin client models or vendors > compatible with PXES? PXES is capable of connecting to more than just Linux machines. LTSP is essentially a Linux to Linux thin client. PXES is a Linux to just about anything thin client. It even supports LTSP. PXES is really just a loadable kernel/configuration set. Generally, it is used on older computers, rather than actual "thin client" hardware, simply because PXES is designed for x86 processors, and many thing client hardware devices are PPC or MIPS. At any rate, I'll give you an example. I use PXES to build a Linux-based thin client that connects to Windows 2003 Terminal Servers for my company. It boots via DHCP/PXE, loads the kernel and initrd, then connects to our load balancer IP address for Windows Terminal Services. We use old Dell GX110 desktops. (My company being the one that pays me, not Gentoo Linux... ;p) --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-0W/ng8J1A65eHpNLJvqL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDVjHPkT4lNIS36YERAmcGAJ9G9Im7i0sSU2hrtGQHAvPg6mPp0wCgqE/c MuJrccuOTKiAYGqFTeFcDn8= =JHyW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-0W/ng8J1A65eHpNLJvqL-- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl