Re: WD Red SN700 4000GB, F/W: 11C120WD (Device not ready; aborting reset, CSTS=0x1)

Sinisa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Dragan (and others),

Just to add my ¢2: I have also had NVMe drives dropping out of md RAID10, after reboot SMART says that they are perfectly fine and I am able to re-add them to 
RAID, just for the same situation to happen a few weeks/months later again.

I have seen this on consumer grade motherboards from ASUS, MSI and Gigabyte, but also on Supermicro servers (actually on only one Supermicro SYS-6029P-TR, but 
multiple times, as far as I can remember).

Affected drives are Samsung 980 Pro and Samsung 990 Pro, but I think there were also some Kingston ones (I have replaced them all in the meantime).

Now, I try to always run the latest stable kernel on those machines/servers, so all of them are now on 6.17 and I think that I haven't seen this problem since I 
upgraded to it.


Btw.

nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0 pcie_aspm=off pcie_port_pm=off

didn't seem to help, I have tried with those parameters before, but the problem would appear after some time, although maybe less frequently.


Btw2.
I don't know if that is related, but I have also had this happen with rotating SATA disks, most recently yesterday on my home/office "server" (MSI PRO B650-P 
WIFI (MS-7D78), 128GB RAM, kernel 6.17.9):
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:18 2025] [    T772] ata6.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:18 2025] [    T772] ata6.00: failed command: FLUSH CACHE EXT
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:18 2025] [    T772] ata6.00: cmd ea/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 3
res 40/00:01:01:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:18 2025] [    T772] ata6.00: status: { DRDY }
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:18 2025] [    T772] ata6: hard resetting link
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:24 2025] [    T772] ata6: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:28 2025] [    T772] ata6: found unknown device (class 0)
[Sun Dec  7 10:12:28 2025] [    T772] ata6: softreset failed (device not ready)
... (repeat last 4 rows 4 more times)
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [    T772] ata6.00: disable device
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [    T772] ata6: EH complete
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [     C14] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#5 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=123s
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [     C14] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#5 CDB: Synchronize Cache(10) 35 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [     C14] I/O error, dev sdb, sector 2064 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x9800 phys_seg 1 prio class 2
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [     C14] md: super_written gets error=-5
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [     C14] md/raid10:md3: Disk failure on sdb1, disabling device.
md/raid10:md3: Operation continuing on 1 devices.
[Sun Dec  7 10:13:19 2025] [     C14] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#6 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
.... (many, many I/O errors)

So this morning I just ran (without reboot):
     for I in /sys/class/scsi_host/host*/scan
       echo "- - -" > $I
     done
and the drive is back, no errors logged in SMART, re-added to RAID, currently re-syncing.


Srdačan pozdrav / Best regards / Freundliche Grüße / Cordialement / よろしくお願いします
Siniša Bandin


On 11/25/25 5:57 PM, Paul Rolland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:19:27 +0100
> Dragan Milivojević <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> Issue/Summary:
>>> 1. Usually once a month, a random WD Red SN700 4TB NVME drive will
>>> drop out of a NAS array, after power cycling the device, it rebuilds
>>> successfully.
>>>   
>> Seen the same, although far less frequent, with Samsung SSD 980 PRO on
>> a Dell PowerEdge R7525.
>> It's the nature of consumer grade drives, I guess.
>>
> Got some issue long time ago, and used :
>
> nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0 pcie_aspm=off pcie_port_pm=off
>
> to boot the kernel. That fixed issue with SN700 2TB.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.