Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] md/raid1: introduce rectify action to repair badblocks
Zheng Qixing <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
>> @@ -700,21 +738,34 @@ static enum sync_action __get_recovery_sync_action(struct mddev *mddev)
>> static enum sync_action get_recovery_sync_action(struct mddev *mddev)
>> {
>> + if (test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_BADBLOCKS_RECTIFY, &mddev->recovery))
>> + return ACTION_RECTIFY;
>> return __get_recovery_sync_action(mddev);
>> }
>> static void init_recovery_position(struct mddev *mddev)
>> {
>> mddev->resync_min = 0;
>> + mddev->rectify_min = 0;
>> +}
>
> As mentioned in patch 1, can we directly reuse resync_min?
To keep rectify's progress separate from check and repair, it's better to use
a dedicated variable to record it.
I'll update the other suggestions in v2.
Thanks,
Qixing