Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid10: fix deadlock with check operation and nowait requests

"Yu Kuai" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.raid
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

在 2026/2/11 0:51, Josh Hunt 写道:
> When an array check is running it will raise the barrier at which point
> normal requests will become blocked and increment the nr_pending value to
> signal there is work pending inside of wait_barrier(). NOWAIT requests
> do not block and so will return immediately with an error, and additionally
> do not increment nr_pending in wait_barrier(). Upstream change
> 43806c3d5b9b ("raid10: cleanup memleak at raid10_make_request") added a
> call to raid_end_bio_io() to fix a memory leak when NOWAIT requests hit
> this condition. raid_end_bio_io() eventually calls allow_barrier() and
> it will unconditionally do an atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending) even
> though the corresponding increment on nr_pending didn't happen in the
> NOWAIT case.
>
> This can be easily seen by starting a check operation while an application is
> doing nowait IO on the same array. This results in a deadlocked state due to
> nr_pending value underflowing and so the md resync thread gets stuck waiting
> for nr_pending to == 0.
>
> Output of r10conf state of the array when we hit this condition:
>
>    crash> struct r10conf.barrier,nr_pending,nr_waiting,nr_queued <addr of r10conf>
>      barrier = 1,
>      nr_pending = {
>        counter = -41
>      },
>      nr_waiting = 15,
>      nr_queued = 0,
>
> Example of md_sync thread stuck waiting on raise_barrier() and other requests
> stuck in wait_barrier():
>
> md1_resync
> [<0>] raise_barrier+0xce/0x1c0
> [<0>] raid10_sync_request+0x1ca/0x1ed0
> [<0>] md_do_sync+0x779/0x1110
> [<0>] md_thread+0x90/0x160
> [<0>] kthread+0xbe/0xf0
> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
> [<0>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> kworker/u1040:2+flush-253:4
> [<0>] wait_barrier+0x1de/0x220
> [<0>] regular_request_wait+0x30/0x180
> [<0>] raid10_make_request+0x261/0x1000
> [<0>] md_handle_request+0x13b/0x230
> [<0>] __submit_bio+0x107/0x1f0
> [<0>] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x16f/0x390
> [<0>] ext4_io_submit+0x24/0x40
> [<0>] ext4_do_writepages+0x254/0xc80
> [<0>] ext4_writepages+0x84/0x120
> [<0>] do_writepages+0x7a/0x260
> [<0>] __writeback_single_inode+0x3d/0x300
> [<0>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x1dd/0x470
> [<0>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x4c/0xe0
> [<0>] wb_writeback+0x18b/0x2d0
> [<0>] wb_workfn+0x2a1/0x400
> [<0>] process_one_work+0x149/0x330
> [<0>] worker_thread+0x2d2/0x410
> [<0>] kthread+0xbe/0xf0
> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
> [<0>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> Fixes: 43806c3d5b9b ("raid10: cleanup memleak at raid10_make_request")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <[email protected]>
> ---
>   drivers/md/raid10.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 9debb20cf129..b05066dde693 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
>    */
>   
>   static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf);
> +static void allow_barrier_nowait(struct r10conf *conf);
>   static void lower_barrier(struct r10conf *conf);
>   static int _enough(struct r10conf *conf, int previous, int ignore);
>   static int enough(struct r10conf *conf, int ignore);
> @@ -317,7 +318,7 @@ static void reschedule_retry(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>    * operation and are ready to return a success/failure code to the buffer
>    * cache layer.
>    */
> -static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
> +static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio, bool adjust_pending)
>   {
>   	struct bio *bio = r10_bio->master_bio;
>   	struct r10conf *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;
> @@ -332,7 +333,10 @@ static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>   	 * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device
>   	 * to go idle.
>   	 */
> -	allow_barrier(conf);
> +	if (adjust_pending)
> +		allow_barrier(conf);
> +	else
> +		allow_barrier_nowait(conf);
>   
>   	free_r10bio(r10_bio);
>   }
> @@ -414,7 +418,7 @@ static void raid10_end_read_request(struct bio *bio)
>   			uptodate = 1;
>   	}
>   	if (uptodate) {
> -		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   		rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
>   	} else {
>   		/*
> @@ -446,7 +450,7 @@ static void one_write_done(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>   			if (test_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state))
>   				reschedule_retry(r10_bio);
>   			else
> -				raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +				raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   		}
>   	}
>   }
> @@ -1030,13 +1034,23 @@ static bool wait_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool nowait)
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf)
> +static void __allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool adjust_pending)
>   {
> -	if ((atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending)) ||
> +	if ((adjust_pending && atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending)) ||
>   			(conf->array_freeze_pending))
>   		wake_up_barrier(conf);
>   }
>   
> +static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf)
> +{
> +	__allow_barrier(conf, true);
> +}
> +
> +static void allow_barrier_nowait(struct r10conf *conf)
> +{
> +	__allow_barrier(conf, false);
> +}
> +
>   static void freeze_array(struct r10conf *conf, int extra)
>   {
>   	/* stop syncio and normal IO and wait for everything to
> @@ -1184,7 +1198,7 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!regular_request_wait(mddev, conf, bio, r10_bio->sectors)) {
> -		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, false);
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1195,7 +1209,7 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   					    mdname(mddev), b,
>   					    (unsigned long long)r10_bio->sector);
>   		}
> -		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   		return;
>   	}
>   	if (err_rdev)
> @@ -1240,7 +1254,7 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   	return;
>   err_handle:
>   	atomic_dec(&rdev->nr_pending);
> -	raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +	raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   }
>   
>   static void raid10_write_one_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio,
> @@ -1372,7 +1386,7 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   
>   	sectors = r10_bio->sectors;
>   	if (!regular_request_wait(mddev, conf, bio, sectors)) {
> -		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +		raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, false);

There really is problem, however the analyze seems a bit wrong.

The master_bio is already handled with bio_wouldblock_error(), it's wrong
to call raid_end_bio_io() directly. Looks like this problem can be fixed by
calling free_r10bio() instead.

>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -1523,7 +1537,7 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +	raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   }
>   
>   static void __make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, int sectors)
> @@ -2952,7 +2966,7 @@ static void handle_write_completed(struct r10conf *conf, struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>   			if (test_bit(R10BIO_WriteError,
>   				     &r10_bio->state))
>   				close_write(r10_bio);
> -			raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +			raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   		}
>   	}
>   }
> @@ -2987,7 +3001,7 @@ static void raid10d(struct md_thread *thread)
>   			if (test_bit(R10BIO_WriteError,
>   				     &r10_bio->state))
>   				close_write(r10_bio);
> -			raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
> +			raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>   		}
>   	}
>   

-- 
Thansk,
Kuai
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.