Re: [PATCH 18/25] x86: move the XOR code to lib/raid/

Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.sparc,gmane.linux.ports.alpha,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.riscv,gmane.linux.uml.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.cryptoapi,gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs,gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch,gmane.linux.raid
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 03:55:29PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 03:30:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2026 at 07:10:30AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Move the optimized XOR code out of line into lib/raid.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/xor.h                    | 518 ++----------------
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/xor_64.h                 |  32 --
> > >  lib/raid/xor/Makefile                         |   8 +
> > >  .../xor_avx.h => lib/raid/xor/x86/xor-avx.c   |  14 +-
> > >  .../xor_32.h => lib/raid/xor/x86/xor-mmx.c    |  60 +-
> > >  lib/raid/xor/x86/xor-sse.c                    | 476 ++++++++++++++++
> > 
> > I gotta ask, why lib/raid/xor/$arch/ instead of something like
> > arch/$arch/lib/xor ?
> 
> Similar to lib/crypto/ and lib/crc/, it allows the translation units
> (either .c or .S files) containing architecture-optimized XOR code to be
> included directly in the xor.ko module, where they should be.
> 
> Previously, these were always built into the core kernel even if
> XOR_BLOCKS was 'n' or 'm', or they were built into a separate module
> xor-neon.ko which xor.ko depended on.  So either the code was included
> unnecessarily, or there was an extra module.
> 
> Technically we could instead have the lib makefile compile stuff in
> arch/, but that would be unusual.  It's much cleaner to have the
> directory structure match the build system.

Hmm, I suppose. Its just weird that we now have to look in both
arch/$foo and lib/*/$foo/ to find all arch code.

And I don't suppose symlinks would make it better?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.