Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid10: fix deadlock with check operation and nowait requests
Josh Hunt <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.raid |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2/25/26 9:24 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
> This Message Is From an External Sender
> This message came from outside your organization.
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
>
> Hi,
>
> 在 2026/2/11 0:51, Josh Hunt 写道:
>> When an array check is running it will raise the barrier at which point
>> normal requests will become blocked and increment the nr_pending value to
>> signal there is work pending inside of wait_barrier(). NOWAIT requests
>> do not block and so will return immediately with an error, and additionally
>> do not increment nr_pending in wait_barrier(). Upstream change
>> 43806c3d5b9b ("raid10: cleanup memleak at raid10_make_request") added a
>> call to raid_end_bio_io() to fix a memory leak when NOWAIT requests hit
>> this condition. raid_end_bio_io() eventually calls allow_barrier() and
>> it will unconditionally do an atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending) even
>> though the corresponding increment on nr_pending didn't happen in the
>> NOWAIT case.
>>
>> This can be easily seen by starting a check operation while an application is
>> doing nowait IO on the same array. This results in a deadlocked state due to
>> nr_pending value underflowing and so the md resync thread gets stuck waiting
>> for nr_pending to == 0.
>>
>> Output of r10conf state of the array when we hit this condition:
>>
>> crash> struct r10conf.barrier,nr_pending,nr_waiting,nr_queued <addr of r10conf>
>> barrier = 1,
>> nr_pending = {
>> counter = -41
>> },
>> nr_waiting = 15,
>> nr_queued = 0,
>>
>> Example of md_sync thread stuck waiting on raise_barrier() and other requests
>> stuck in wait_barrier():
>>
>> md1_resync
>> [<0>] raise_barrier+0xce/0x1c0
>> [<0>] raid10_sync_request+0x1ca/0x1ed0
>> [<0>] md_do_sync+0x779/0x1110
>> [<0>] md_thread+0x90/0x160
>> [<0>] kthread+0xbe/0xf0
>> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
>> [<0>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>>
>> kworker/u1040:2+flush-253:4
>> [<0>] wait_barrier+0x1de/0x220
>> [<0>] regular_request_wait+0x30/0x180
>> [<0>] raid10_make_request+0x261/0x1000
>> [<0>] md_handle_request+0x13b/0x230
>> [<0>] __submit_bio+0x107/0x1f0
>> [<0>] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x16f/0x390
>> [<0>] ext4_io_submit+0x24/0x40
>> [<0>] ext4_do_writepages+0x254/0xc80
>> [<0>] ext4_writepages+0x84/0x120
>> [<0>] do_writepages+0x7a/0x260
>> [<0>] __writeback_single_inode+0x3d/0x300
>> [<0>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x1dd/0x470
>> [<0>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x4c/0xe0
>> [<0>] wb_writeback+0x18b/0x2d0
>> [<0>] wb_workfn+0x2a1/0x400
>> [<0>] process_one_work+0x149/0x330
>> [<0>] worker_thread+0x2d2/0x410
>> [<0>] kthread+0xbe/0xf0
>> [<0>] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
>> [<0>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>>
>> Fixes: 43806c3d5b9b ("raid10: cleanup memleak at raid10_make_request")
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Signed-off-by: Josh Hunt <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/raid10.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> index 9debb20cf129..b05066dde693 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf);
>> +static void allow_barrier_nowait(struct r10conf *conf);
>> static void lower_barrier(struct r10conf *conf);
>> static int _enough(struct r10conf *conf, int previous, int ignore);
>> static int enough(struct r10conf *conf, int ignore);
>> @@ -317,7 +318,7 @@ static void reschedule_retry(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> * operation and are ready to return a success/failure code to the buffer
>> * cache layer.
>> */
>> -static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> +static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio, bool adjust_pending)
>> {
>> struct bio *bio = r10_bio->master_bio;
>> struct r10conf *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;
>> @@ -332,7 +333,10 @@ static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device
>> * to go idle.
>> */
>> - allow_barrier(conf);
>> + if (adjust_pending)
>> + allow_barrier(conf);
>> + else
>> + allow_barrier_nowait(conf);
>>
>> free_r10bio(r10_bio);
>> }
>> @@ -414,7 +418,7 @@ static void raid10_end_read_request(struct bio *bio)
>> uptodate = 1;
>> }
>> if (uptodate) {
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> rdev_dec_pending(rdev, conf->mddev);
>> } else {
>> /*
>> @@ -446,7 +450,7 @@ static void one_write_done(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> if (test_bit(R10BIO_MadeGood, &r10_bio->state))
>> reschedule_retry(r10_bio);
>> else
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -1030,13 +1034,23 @@ static bool wait_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool nowait)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> -static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf)
>> +static void __allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf, bool adjust_pending)
>> {
>> - if ((atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending)) ||
>> + if ((adjust_pending && atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending)) ||
>> (conf->array_freeze_pending))
>> wake_up_barrier(conf);
>> }
>>
>> +static void allow_barrier(struct r10conf *conf)
>> +{
>> + __allow_barrier(conf, true);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void allow_barrier_nowait(struct r10conf *conf)
>> +{
>> + __allow_barrier(conf, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void freeze_array(struct r10conf *conf, int extra)
>> {
>> /* stop syncio and normal IO and wait for everything to
>> @@ -1184,7 +1198,7 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> }
>>
>> if (!regular_request_wait(mddev, conf, bio, r10_bio->sectors)) {
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, false);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1195,7 +1209,7 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> mdname(mddev), b,
>> (unsigned long long)r10_bio->sector);
>> }
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> return;
>> }
>> if (err_rdev)
>> @@ -1240,7 +1254,7 @@ static void raid10_read_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> return;
>> err_handle:
>> atomic_dec(&rdev->nr_pending);
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> }
>>
>> static void raid10_write_one_disk(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio,
>> @@ -1372,7 +1386,7 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>>
>> sectors = r10_bio->sectors;
>> if (!regular_request_wait(mddev, conf, bio, sectors)) {
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, false);
>
> There really is problem, however the analyze seems a bit wrong.
>
> The master_bio is already handled with bio_wouldblock_error(), it's wrong
> to call raid_end_bio_io() directly. Looks like this problem can be fixed by
> calling free_r10bio() instead.
Thanks for the feedback. I tried this and indeed it does also fix the
issue for me so will send over a v3 here shortly. Appreciate the help!
>
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1523,7 +1537,7 @@ static void raid10_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> }
>>
>> static void __make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio, int sectors)
>> @@ -2952,7 +2966,7 @@ static void handle_write_completed(struct r10conf *conf, struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>> if (test_bit(R10BIO_WriteError,
>> &r10_bio->state))
>> close_write(r10_bio);
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> @@ -2987,7 +3001,7 @@ static void raid10d(struct md_thread *thread)
>> if (test_bit(R10BIO_WriteError,
>> &r10_bio->state))
>> close_write(r10_bio);
>> - raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio);
>> + raid_end_bio_io(r10_bio, true);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
Josh