Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] md/raid10: fix IO error at logical block size granularity
Xiao Ni <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALTww2_cU_kMCROQFOri6LvaTGipe_tMgsBmkaJdahCFizDoTw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 11:51 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Li Nan <[email protected]> > > RAID10 currently fixes IO error at PAGE_SIZE granularity. Fix at smaller > granularity can handle more errors, and RAID will support logical block > sizes larger than PAGE_SIZE in the future, where PAGE_SIZE IO will fail. > > Switch IO error fix granularity to logical block size. > > Signed-off-by: Li Nan <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/md/raid10.c | 17 ++++------------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c > index 3638e00fe420..5b4ffd23211a 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c > @@ -2454,7 +2454,7 @@ static void sync_request_write(struct mddev *mddev, struct r10bio *r10_bio) > static void fix_recovery_read_error(struct r10bio *r10_bio) > { > /* We got a read error during recovery. > - * We repeat the read in smaller page-sized sections. > + * We repeat the read in smaller logical_block_sized sections. > * If a read succeeds, write it to the new device or record > * a bad block if we cannot. > * If a read fails, record a bad block on both old and > @@ -2470,14 +2470,11 @@ static void fix_recovery_read_error(struct r10bio *r10_bio) > struct folio *folio = get_resync_folio(bio)->folio; > > while (sectors) { > - int s = sectors; > + int s = min_t(int, sectors, mddev->logical_block_size >> 9); > struct md_rdev *rdev; > sector_t addr; > int ok; > > - if (s > (PAGE_SIZE>>9)) > - s = PAGE_SIZE >> 9; > - > rdev = conf->mirrors[dr].rdev; > addr = r10_bio->devs[0].addr + sect; > ok = sync_folio_io(rdev, > @@ -2621,14 +2618,11 @@ static void fix_read_error(struct r10conf *conf, struct mddev *mddev, struct r10 > } > > while(sectors) { > - int s = sectors; > + int s = min_t(int, sectors, mddev->logical_block_size >> 9); > int sl = slot; > int success = 0; > int start; > > - if (s > (PAGE_SIZE>>9)) > - s = PAGE_SIZE >> 9; > - > do { > d = r10_bio->devs[sl].devnum; > rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev; > @@ -4926,13 +4920,10 @@ static int handle_reshape_read_error(struct mddev *mddev, > __raid10_find_phys(&conf->prev, r10b); > > while (sectors) { > - int s = sectors; > + int s = min_t(int, sectors, mddev->logical_block_size >> 9); > int success = 0; > int first_slot = slot; > > - if (s > (PAGE_SIZE >> 9)) > - s = PAGE_SIZE >> 9; > - > while (!success) { > int d = r10b->devs[slot].devnum; > struct md_rdev *rdev = conf->mirrors[d].rdev; > -- > 2.39.2 > > This patch looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <[email protected]>