Re: [PATCH 2/7] md/raid1: handle atomic writes that require splitting

On 23/06/2026 08:24, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi wrote:
> If a request already requires splitting when entering
> raid1_write_request(), the current code allows it to proceed until it
> eventually reaches the split path. 

The block layer should catch invalid atomic writes in 
submit_bio_noacct() -> blk_validate_atomic_write_op_size() before we 
even get as far as the md atomic write handling. Having the check in 
bio_submit_split_bioset() is really just a fail-safe for the block layer 
not catching invalid atomic writes or the atomic writes queue limits not 
being properly calculated.

> Along the way, the bio may instead
> fail due to other conditions and return a different status, even though
> the request was invalid as an atomic write from the beginning.
> 
> Additionally, an otherwise valid atomic write may later require
> splitting because bad blocks reduce the writable range or because
> write-behind constraints reduce the maximum writable size. In these
> cases, the bio currently completes with either EINVAL or ENOTSUPP,
> whereas it should complete with EIO instead.
> 
> Fixes: f2a38abf5f1c ("md/raid1: Atomic write support")
> Fixes: a4c55c902670 ("md/raid1: simplify raid1_write_request() error handling")
> Signed-off-by: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <[email protected]>
> ---
>   drivers/md/raid1.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index 86d4f224ffb1..8386d37343a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -1511,9 +1511,15 @@ static bool raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   	int first_clone;
>   	bool write_behind = false;
>   	bool nowait = bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT;
> +	bool atomic = bio->bi_opf & REQ_ATOMIC;
>   	bool is_discard = op_is_discard(bio->bi_opf);
>   	sector_t sector = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector;
>   
> +	if (atomic && max_sectors != bio_sectors(bio)) {
> +		bio_endio_status(bio, BLK_STS_INVAL);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (mddev_is_clustered(mddev) &&
>   	    mddev->cluster_ops->area_resyncing(mddev, WRITE, sector,
>   					       bio_end_sector(bio))) {
> @@ -1592,20 +1598,6 @@ static bool raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   			}
>   			if (is_bad) {
>   				int good_sectors;
> -
> -				/*
> -				 * We cannot atomically write this, so just
> -				 * error in that case. It could be possible to
> -				 * atomically write other mirrors, but the
> -				 * complexity of supporting that is not worth
> -				 * the benefit.
> -				 */
> -				if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_ATOMIC) {
> -					bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_NOTSUPP;

what baseline are you using here? This looks different to linux-next 22 
june and linus' master branch

> -					bio_endio(bio);
> -					goto err_dec_pending;
> -				}
> -
>   				good_sectors = first_bad - sector;
>   				if (good_sectors < max_sectors)
>   					max_sectors = good_sectors;
> @@ -1626,6 +1618,11 @@ static bool raid1_write_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio,
>   		max_sectors = min_t(int, max_sectors,
>   				    BIO_MAX_VECS * (PAGE_SIZE >> 9));
>   	if (max_sectors < bio_sectors(bio)) {
> +		if (atomic) {
> +			bio_io_error(bio);
> +			goto err_dec_pending;
> +		}
> +
>   		bio = bio_submit_split_bioset(bio, max_sectors,
>   					      &conf->bio_split);
>   		if (!bio)