[syzbot] [raid?] possible deadlock in md_start_sync

syzbot <[email protected]> Sat, 01 Aug 2026 17:00:33 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.linux.raid,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    62cc90241548 Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2026-07-27-14-1..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1297e449580000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=b7079b368dcec295
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=13eb8132f7693fe21d7d
compiler:       gcc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.44

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1d08b858b4e9/disk-62cc9024.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/85154cc68abb/vmlinux-62cc9024.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/c7121b8e9e61/bzImage-62cc9024.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: [email protected]

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
syzkaller #0 Tainted: G             L     
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/0:7/5865 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88805a656358 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: mddev_lock_nointr drivers/md/md.h:735 [inline]
ffff88805a656358 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: md_start_sync+0x79/0xbe0 drivers/md/md.c:10190

but task is already holding lock:
ffffc900044bfd08 ((work_completion)(&mddev->sync_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x988/0x1940 kernel/workqueue.c:3298

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 ((work_completion)(&mddev->sync_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       process_one_work+0x98e/0x1940 kernel/workqueue.c:3298
       process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3405 [inline]
       worker_thread+0x5ef/0xe50 kernel/workqueue.c:3486
       kthread+0x370/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436
       ret_from_fork+0x72b/0xd50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

-> #2 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       touch_wq_lockdep_map+0xad/0x1c0 kernel/workqueue.c:4037
       __flush_workqueue+0x131/0x1200 kernel/workqueue.c:4079
       md_alloc+0x30/0x10a0 drivers/md/md.c:6313
       md_alloc_and_put drivers/md/md.c:6402 [inline]
       md_probe drivers/md/md.c:6418 [inline]
       md_probe+0x73/0xf0 drivers/md/md.c:6413
       blk_probe_dev+0x149/0x1e0 block/genhd.c:880
       blk_request_module+0x16/0xc0 block/genhd.c:893
       blkdev_get_no_open+0x9b/0xf0 block/bdev.c:828
       blkdev_open+0x141/0x4f0 block/fops.c:663
       do_dentry_open+0x6ab/0x14d0 fs/open.c:947
       vfs_open+0x82/0x3f0 fs/open.c:1052
       do_open fs/namei.c:4700 [inline]
       path_openat+0x2873/0x4280 fs/namei.c:4863
       do_file_open+0x20e/0x430 fs/namei.c:4892
       do_sys_openat2+0x10f/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1368
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1374 [inline]
       __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1390 [inline]
       __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1385 [inline]
       __x64_sys_openat+0x12d/0x210 fs/open.c:1385
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x115/0x870 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #1 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
       blk_probe_dev+0x28/0x1e0 block/genhd.c:877
       blk_request_module+0x16/0xc0 block/genhd.c:893
       blkdev_get_no_open+0x9b/0xf0 block/bdev.c:828
       bdev_file_open_by_dev block/bdev.c:1049 [inline]
       bdev_file_open_by_dev+0x70/0x210 block/bdev.c:1037
       md_import_device+0x120/0x360 drivers/md/md.c:3845
       md_add_new_disk+0xdbf/0x1820 drivers/md/md.c:7637
       md_ioctl+0x2b28/0x36b0 drivers/md/md.c:8476
       blkdev_ioctl+0x5ad/0x6f0 block/ioctl.c:797
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:583 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x18e/0x210 fs/ioctl.c:583
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x115/0x870 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

-> #0 (&mddev->reconfig_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
       check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x136c/0x1a40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
       mddev_lock_nointr drivers/md/md.h:735 [inline]
       md_start_sync+0x79/0xbe0 drivers/md/md.c:10190
       process_one_work+0xa23/0x1940 kernel/workqueue.c:3322
       process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3405 [inline]
       worker_thread+0x5ef/0xe50 kernel/workqueue.c:3486
       kthread+0x370/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436
       ret_from_fork+0x72b/0xd50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
       ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &mddev->reconfig_mutex --> (wq_completion)md_misc --> (work_completion)(&mddev->sync_work)

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock((work_completion)(&mddev->sync_work));
                               lock((wq_completion)md_misc);
                               lock((work_completion)(&mddev->sync_work));
  lock(&mddev->reconfig_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by kworker/0:7/5865:
 #0: ffff888020ee8d40 ((wq_completion)md_misc){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x12b1/0x1940 kernel/workqueue.c:3297
 #1: ffffc900044bfd08 ((work_completion)(&mddev->sync_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x988/0x1940 kernel/workqueue.c:3298

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5865 Comm: kworker/0:7 Tainted: G             L      syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) 
Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/16/2026
Workqueue: md_misc md_start_sync
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x100/0x190 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1c7 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043
 check_noncircular+0x146/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xe60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x136c/0x1a40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1b9/0x370 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:646 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x1a4/0x1bd0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:821
 mddev_lock_nointr drivers/md/md.h:735 [inline]
 md_start_sync+0x79/0xbe0 drivers/md/md.c:10190
 process_one_work+0xa23/0x1940 kernel/workqueue.c:3322
 process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:3405 [inline]
 worker_thread+0x5ef/0xe50 kernel/workqueue.c:3486
 kthread+0x370/0x450 kernel/kthread.c:436
 ret_from_fork+0x72b/0xd50 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at [email protected].

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup