Re: x86 hal_*.c #if'ed out?
Sebastian Kuzminsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.real-time.rtai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/24/15 5:02 AM, Paolo Mantegazza wrote: > So now there are just rt_request/free_timers. > Therefore reason you do not see the above mentioned function is that I > did thought that the hard timers should have not been used at its level, > as they were just for start/stop_rt_timer found in the scheduler. > In any case I would like to not break any established usage of interest. > So, if you give mi a list of missing functions > I'll care to provide them again through an appropriate wrapping with the > core supports. Thanks for the explanations. The only API function from RTAI 3.x that I've found missing in RTAI 5.0-test1 (Vulcano) in my testing so far is rt_free_timer(). I'm calling rt_free_timers() instead and that's working fine. The LinuxCNC build system detects the RTAI version (by running "rtai-config --version"), and can take different actions based on what it finds. It would work fine for us to use the RTAI 5 API (rt_free_timers()) on RTAI 5 and the RTAI 3 API (rt_free_timer()) on older versions. Or if you want to add rt_free_timer() back into the API, we could keep calling that. Either way works for us. -- Sebastian Kuzminsky _______________________________________________ Rtai mailing list [email protected] https://mail.rtai.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rtai