Re: RTAI 5.0-test2 released
Alec Ari <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.real-time.rtai |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Seb, Upstream RTAI is pretty brutal for LinuxCNC development. I know you don't want to use my tree, but it works beautifully for all the platforms I've tested it on, both 32-bit and 64. Jeff Epler really helped push along the math fixes and sorted out those mind-boggling SSE fixes, and I couldn't have done it without him. I honestly don't know why you're so concerned about it being from rtai.org if the tree is generally broken for LinuxCNC. If you really want to insist on using this tree, you're going to have to be the one who does the work to get it going, which most likely means a full re-write of RTAPI and whatever else, just to make it work using the stuff from here. Nobody else here cares about LinuxCNC except us, so you're going to have to be the expert who does the work yourself if you p lan on using the mainline RTAI tree. If you ever get fed up (I know I did) you know where it's at. I've never experienced a single hang or crash from there after the majority of the work was complet e. Good luck and hope you figure this stuff out. Alec Ari _______________________________________________ Rtai mailing list [email protected] https://mail.rtai.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rtai