Re: Re: Debina install

There was a note in one of the FAQ's or installs that mentioned that 2.96.X 
compilers did not work and that 2.95.3 or .4 was needed. 
 
  EBo -- 
 
Norm <[email protected]> said: 
 
> I have had inconsistent success using the 2.96.x compiler that ships with 
> RedHat 7.2 but never a single failure with 2.95.3. 
>  
> I remember reading in kernel mailing list messages that it is the preferred 
> 2.x.y version of the compiler for the kernel. 
>  
>     YMMV 
>  
>         Norm 
>  
> ----- Original Message -----  
> From: "Dale Stein" <[email protected]> 
> To: <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 7:21 PM 
> Subject: [Rtl] Re: Debina install 
>  
>  
> > For a long time I have been unable to compile and get a successful 
> > regression test with 
> > rtlinux3.2-per3. I have used all of the kernels that were patchable with 
> > the rtlinux patch and nothing really worked.   So a few months ago I made 
> > a old lfs v3.3  on a spare partition. 
> > This version uses gcc 2.95.3 (which is what I used before), kernel 2.4.22 
> > and 
> > glibc-2.2.5.   The only real difference is glibc, I think, well, there 
are 
> > many others, but 
> > glibc and gcc are hand in hand generating the final code. 
> >     So I am wondering weather failed regression tests are the result of 
> the 
> > glibc version used, and not just the gcc version used? 
> > Dale Stein 
> > 
> > 
> > --  
> > Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Rtl mailing list 
> > [email protected] 
> > http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl 
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> Rtl mailing list 
> [email protected] 
> http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl 
>  
 
 
 
--  
 
 
_______________________________________________
Rtl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl