Re: Rtl Build Instructions

> 
> I built RTL according to 
> <http://www.opentech.at/howtos/multiboot-howto/html/install_en_1.html> for 
> RHL 9. RHL 9 is dead, as of some many months ago. I'd like to replace RHL 9 
> with something more current and that has a life (future). What's a good 
> choice but which will support RTL? I understand many RHL 9 users have 
> switched to some version of Fedora. Can I do this without removing RHL9, 
> RTL, and my app? I'm not adverse to doing this, but I need some assurance 
> that my app (which I did not write) will work in the new environment.

Hi !

Seems like this one also never got an answer...

we have good experience with Slackware - mainly because it uses a vanilla
kernel by default and conforms well to Linux Filesystem standard. Toolchain
is clean for kernel and rtlinux and patches for the 2.4.22 and 2.4.26 
(Slackware 9.1 or Slackware 10.0) are available. One nice thing about 
slackware is that it provides no GUI tool for administration that forces
you to use that tool but everything is controlled via shell scripts that
simply are turned on or off by chmod. So its easy to cusomize.

The kickstart manuals found on opentech.at give a step by stop guide for
installing rtlinux on Slackware 9.1/10.0 .

hofrat


_______________________________________________
Rtl mailing list
[email protected]
http://www2.fsmlabs.com/mailman/listinfo/rtl