Re: Opteron Vs. Athlon X2
"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 19:35 -0500, Peter Arremann wrote: > E6 stepping has better memory timing capability (400 with a higher number of > memory banks) Huh? All Socket-939/940 processors have 4x 32-bit banks (2x 64-bit DDR channels). FYI, Socket-754 + 184 (2nd DDR channel traces) = 938. ;-> > and improved power saving. E3s overclock better though :-D > The board you've got is a 939 pin socket and will not accept dual core cpus or > opterons (socket 940). FYI, the new dual-core Opteron 165 and 175 are Socket-939. They use unregistered DDR SDRAM, just like any other Socket-939 processor. > Not really that much. In fact, because of the slower memory timing of socker > 940 opterons (registered memory adds latency) the performance improvements > from the larger cache are mostly negated according to our tests. Agreed, but if you're going with a Socket-939 Opteron 1xx, then that's not an issue. > No - Socket 940 (most opterons) and 939 (some 1xx opterons and Athlon64) are > not compatible. The 939 1xx opterons that are out now are nothing more than a > relabeled Athlon64 X2 anyway. Huh? Not exactly true, especially since some are E5 and others are E6. And there _are_ the thermal differences. > I would recommend the X2 over two 2xx single core opterons. You can reuse your > memory if you choose to. You will save yourself money on CPU and memory. Your > motherboard will be cheaper. The opterons will be louder because of the addl. > fans. Not if you get the "HE" single core versions that use only 55W. The Opteron 246HE is virtually _no_ premium over the older 246. The Opteron 250+ are the newer steppings. You'll have twice the number of memory channels and width. But from a cost perspective, I agree. > If you're thinking of a single 1xx 939 opteron you might have a hard time > finding a board with support for it (two months ago I could barely find any > boards that were certified for it). It will run anyway just fine on 99% of > all 939 boards that work with the equivalent X2. Agreed. The value of the Socket-939 Opteron 1xx is really the new, entry-level server mainboards built for it. We've talked about the SuperMicro here. > On the other side, if you go for dual 2xx opterons and you pay extra for a > good board, you get a huge improvement on IO. Multiple PCI-X busses and the > like are nice to have on most servers but for a developers workstation it > doesn't really matter. As long as you don't need more than 100MBps in disk and network. Otherwise, PCI-X is still much better because most desktop mainboards only ship with PCIe x1 channels outside of video. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:[email protected] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------ Some things (or athletes) money can't buy. For everything else there's "ManningCard."