Re: Opteron Vs. Athlon X2

"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.amd64
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 19:35 -0500, Peter Arremann wrote:
> E6 stepping has better memory timing capability (400 with a higher number of 
> memory banks)

Huh?  All Socket-939/940 processors have 4x 32-bit banks (2x 64-bit DDR
channels).  FYI, Socket-754 + 184 (2nd DDR channel traces) = 938.  ;->

> and improved power saving. E3s overclock better though :-D
> The board you've got is a 939 pin socket and will not accept dual core cpus or 
> opterons (socket 940).

FYI, the new dual-core Opteron 165 and 175 are Socket-939.  They use
unregistered DDR SDRAM, just like any other Socket-939 processor.

> Not really that much. In fact, because of the slower memory timing of socker 
> 940 opterons (registered memory adds latency) the performance improvements 
> from the larger cache are mostly negated according to our tests.

Agreed, but if you're going with a Socket-939 Opteron 1xx, then that's
not an issue.

> No - Socket 940 (most opterons) and 939 (some 1xx opterons and Athlon64) are 
> not compatible. The 939 1xx opterons that are out now are nothing more than a 
> relabeled Athlon64 X2 anyway. 

Huh?  Not exactly true, especially since some are E5 and others are E6.
And there _are_ the thermal differences.

> I would recommend the X2 over two 2xx single core opterons. You can reuse your 
> memory if you choose to. You will save yourself money on CPU and memory. Your 
> motherboard will be cheaper. The opterons will be louder because of the addl. 
> fans. 

Not if you get the "HE" single core versions that use only 55W.  The
Opteron 246HE is virtually _no_ premium over the older 246.  The Opteron
250+ are the newer steppings.  You'll have twice the number of memory
channels and width.

But from a cost perspective, I agree.

> If you're thinking of a single 1xx 939 opteron you might have a hard time 
> finding a board with support for it (two months ago I could barely find any 
> boards that were certified for it). It will run anyway just fine on 99% of 
> all 939 boards that work with the equivalent X2.  

Agreed.  The value of the Socket-939 Opteron 1xx is really the new,
entry-level server mainboards built for it.  We've talked about the
SuperMicro here.

> On the other side, if you go for dual 2xx opterons and you pay extra for a 
> good board, you get a huge improvement on IO. Multiple PCI-X busses and the 
> like are nice to have on most servers but for a developers workstation it 
> doesn't really matter.

As long as you don't need more than 100MBps in disk and network.
Otherwise, PCI-X is still much better because most desktop mainboards
only ship with PCIe x1 channels outside of video.


-- 
Bryan J. Smith   mailto:[email protected]
http://thebs413.blogspot.com
------------------------------------------
Some things (or athletes) money can't buy.
For everything else there's "ManningCard."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.