Re: Opteron Vs. Athlon X2
Mark Hahn <[email protected]> Wed, 7 Dec 2005 16:48:25 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0512071555000.13857-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca> |
> The differences between 939 pin opterons and amd64's are from what > I can tell only clock speed and cache. there are some which apparently have the same pinout, clock, cache. I didn't check to see whether they have the same rev, though (sse3?) > S939 opterons and S939 amd64's use non-registered memory. They support > ECC, but many motherboards seem not to support it. On the ones I've > checked the manual nor bios mentioned ECC. Additionally in other manuals > I've seen that ECC "works" but doesn't provide ECC functionality. the tyan S2866 appears to be a fairly normal s939 which http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tomcatk8esli.html the manual definitely presents ECC options and even shows 'enabled' as the reccomended/default. this board looks pretty nice - anyone have experience with it? the S2866G3NR model even has integrated video, and avoids the 3-stack of audio connectors that prevent some boards fitting 1U. even has IPMI support, though some people might shed a tears about multiple nics on a 32x33 PCI and on weekends, you can use NV SLI on it ;) actually, now that I look, the supermicro H8SSL-i also definitely supports ECC (and might have a slightly nicer LAN config.) for sheer obsessive completeness, I also checked the manual for the asus a8n5x - unquestionably a desktop-oriented board. it also appears to have a working ECC config option, though it defaults off. regards, mark hahn.