Re: Microcontrollers/ASICs v. General Purpose Microprocessors -- WAS: Opteron Vs. Athlon X2
"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]> Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:51:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 00:08 -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > oranges are easier to peel than apples. what was the question? > 10GE is a different category of thing than HT. Exactly! ;-> > myri 10G does. I'm sorry, I meant 802.3 layer-2, not layer-2 in general (which is abstract). > you have some weird ideas of what Beowulf is. Apparently, because I'm used to using it to distribute apps that scale linearly because they are CPU bound, not I/O bound. > are you trying to spell "InfiniPath"? Actually, I meant InfiniBand technology (I guess I just finished a DNS discussion on another list -- DOH!), including all instances of it. > afaikt you're claiming that beowulf is low-bandwidth. that's just weird! Sigh. I meant it's _lower_ than having a direct HyperTransport interconnect between CPUs -- or some other, scalable interconnect. Beowulf is about cost versus such solutions when you need CPU more than I/O -- or at least at a much lower rate than local interconnects. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:[email protected] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------ Some things (or athletes) money can't buy. For everything else there's "ManningCard."