Re: Athlon 64, Memory Pricing
"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:15:24 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert L Cochran <[email protected]> wrote: > I hope this isn't too stupid a question, but are AMD > processors (and memory sticks, come to think of it) cheaper > to buy after Christmas? Except for at initial product launch (when scarcity drives massive/unethical spikes), immediate demand has very little to do with semiconductor cost. Semiconductor cost is largely a factor of more longer-term trends, especially considering the cost of fabs (billions USD) and sometimes it's cheaper to keep a fab going than to shut it down (long, long story/discussion). > Or will pricing remain the same? I assume that among you are > experienced cpu snf memory buyers, and I'm always open to > practical buying advice. New CPU products drive down other prices. Same deal with GPU. Memory prices fluctuate far more radically. Usually based on raw material supply more than anything. Although fab capacity and longer-term demand are also factors. But virtually _nothing_ is due to short-term demand With the exception of initial product launch. -- Bryan J. Smith | Sent from Yahoo Mail mailto:[email protected] | (please excuse any http://thebs413.blogspot.com/ | missing headers) -- amd64-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list