Re: DDR or DDR2
"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]> Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:50:30 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mohamad Al-Saqer <[email protected]> wrote: > what is an advantage would the opteron offer me over the > regular 939 athlon if both have same FSB and cache, > considering the price difference. What price difference? Have you actually priced the new Socket-939 Opterons?!?!?! They're maybe $20 more. They are: A. Tested to higher tolerances/specifications B. Always 1MiB L2 cache (2MiB L2 in dual-core versions) C. Always lead Athlon 64 in various improvements (like FX) > For instance: > Lowest price for opteron 175 is: $496.25 > while for X2 4400+ is $459.50 > where both have 2.2GHz with 2MB cache and 1000MHz FSB. God forbid, $35 more. > Actually I am considering a dual socket with two single core > processors. I guess this will reduce my choices to only 2xx > opteron series, right? Correct. Some of the Socket-940 Opteron 2xx are quite cheap these days. Of course, you'll then pay more for Registered DDR SDRAM -- something the Socket-939 Opteron doesn't have to do. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [email protected] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ---------------------------------------------------- *** Speed doesn't kill, difference in speed does *** -- amd64-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/amd64-list