Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5
Jay Turner <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:25:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 23:31 +0530, Tamal wrote: > Here is a interesting stat: > Inatallation time for Fedora 5 (x86-64): almost 2 hour > Installation time for Suse 10.0 (x86): just 1 hour > > ______________________________________________________________________ > AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (1800 MHz), MSI K8NGM2 -IL, UMAX 512 MB @ 400 MHz > (128MB shared by video memory), Samsung Puma 40 GB @ 7200 RPM Similar package sets? Any other information about where the majority of the time was spent? - jkt -- --*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--* Jay Turner, QE Manager [email protected] Red Hat, Inc. If A equals success, then the formula is: A = X + Y + Z, X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut. - Albert Einstein
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEI+U/A/BpaFGKSrwRAi7GAJ9oKjEu6pycBPygtclb+uiFTCqg8wCfTGnX 4xkujb3EPL/q4QHV+L0bQtk= =6jCo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----