Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5

"Tamal" <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:38:41 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.amd64
Organization Home
Message-ID <002d01c6501e$0377c660$0201a8c0@homepc>
Both was tested on the same computer with different partitions. Both 
consumes about 6.5 to 7 GB. But in terms of packages offered in two 
distributions, SuSE 10.0 is far better than Fedora core 5.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joshua Jensen" <[email protected]>
To: "Tamal" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5


> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:31:48PM +0530, Tamal wrote:
>> Here is a interesting stat:
>> Inatallation time for Fedora 5 (x86-64): almost 2 hour
>> Installation time for Suse 10.0 (x86): just 1 hour
>
> You are comparing red oranges to orange apples here.  What the resulting
> size of the the two installs.  More importantly, do you have
> arch-to-arch comparasions?
>
> -- 
> Joshua Jensen
> [email protected]
> Please consider contributing to my Marathon Run to fight Leukemia:
> http://www.active.com/donate/tntenc/RaceoftheJoshes