Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5
"Tamal" <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:38:41 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Organization | Home |
| Message-ID | <002d01c6501e$0377c660$0201a8c0@homepc> |
Both was tested on the same computer with different partitions. Both consumes about 6.5 to 7 GB. But in terms of packages offered in two distributions, SuSE 10.0 is far better than Fedora core 5. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joshua Jensen" <[email protected]> To: "Tamal" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 7:39 PM Subject: Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5 > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:31:48PM +0530, Tamal wrote: >> Here is a interesting stat: >> Inatallation time for Fedora 5 (x86-64): almost 2 hour >> Installation time for Suse 10.0 (x86): just 1 hour > > You are comparing red oranges to orange apples here. What the resulting > size of the the two installs. More importantly, do you have > arch-to-arch comparasions? > > -- > Joshua Jensen > [email protected] > Please consider contributing to my Marathon Run to fight Leukemia: > http://www.active.com/donate/tntenc/RaceoftheJoshes