Re: Suse 10.0 vs. Fedora core 5

On Saturday 25 March 2006 08:16am, Tamal wrote:
> I had selected maximum packages I could select in both destributions.

In SUSE, that would be something like 3000+ packages (out of 3400+).
For FC, that would be approximately 1600 package (I think).

But still, I don't see any relevance or viability to saying, "SUSE must be 
better because they install lots of junk I don't need in only 1 hour, where 
FC took me 2 hours to install all that junk and there wasn't as much junk."  
Um, maybe I just found the relevance?

> Another information:
> Fedora core 4 (x86) with minimal installation takes 13 minutes, whereas

I still don't think that Red Hat (RHEL or FC) minimal installs are very 
minimal.  On FC4, I can strip out 60 packages pretty quickly following a 
minimal install.  Sure a few usually end up coming back due to dependencies, 
but most don't.  All that without even really trying.

> Mandriva 2006 x86-64 with standard (default) installation takes 10 min.

No comment.
-- 
Lamont R. Peterson <[email protected]>
Senior Instructor
Guru Labs, L.C. [ http://www.GuruLabs.com/ ]
GPG Key fingerprint: F98C E31A 5C4C 834A BCAB  8CB3 F980 6C97 DC0D D409

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBEKPLs+YBsl9wN1AkRApLmAJ9ZOwmLQXrvkEBJqxq/vOkxw8Ld+wCfSivw
dWIY9zB2XP0zNhGklzjC7ak=
=f3cC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----