Re: Kernel source
"Bryan J. Smith" <[email protected]> Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:33:25 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.amd64 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 17:36 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > That's an "issue" if that's the case. It is the case. NDIS is object code and it's linked to the GPL code. No different than how Atheros does its WLAN module either. > Now, I think you misunderstand how this stuff works because really > nobody is so stupid to do static linking to GPL stuff with non-GPL > stuff; Linus has stated, on the LKML, with regards to the Atheros module and others. I'll find the link for you. > that's the part where your lawyer will yell at you for being a > total idiot. Be careful with that assertion. > With dynamic linking it gets a bit of a gray area (is it > "derived" if you dynamic link? Is it still independent enough to be able > to ship it in one work? That's where you have to consult your lawyer to > get any meaningful answer, which may even vary per jurisdiction :) If the non-GPL code was written for _another_OS_, how can it be a "derived work"? That's basically what Linus said. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, technical annoyance mailto:[email protected] http://thebs413.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------ ****** Speed doesn't kill. Difference in speed does! ******