Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?

Chris Murphy <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:32:25 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.anaconda.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.kernel
Message-ID <CAJCQCtT8D9zuf-iFCD3XKP67usrZgH2yAC=XiyfnGaLpyGNUEQ@mail.gmail.com>
The language being used by Anaconda team suggests the "Btrfs is not a
priority" and should be unsupported, is a decision that has already
happened. This discussion, in this thread, is about how to handle that
decision in UI/Ux. When and where did this decision get made? How do
outside contributors get the information they need to know their
efforts are worthwhile? I have hundreds of hours invested in Anaconda
testing, perhaps 1/2 not related to Btrfs, over ~8 years. I would like
answers to these questions.

-- 
Chris Murphy