Re: Discussion: what would not blocking on btrfs look like?
Chris Murphy <[email protected]> Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:32:25 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.anaconda.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJCQCtT8D9zuf-iFCD3XKP67usrZgH2yAC=XiyfnGaLpyGNUEQ@mail.gmail.com> |
The language being used by Anaconda team suggests the "Btrfs is not a priority" and should be unsupported, is a decision that has already happened. This discussion, in this thread, is about how to handle that decision in UI/Ux. When and where did this decision get made? How do outside contributors get the information they need to know their efforts are worthwhile? I have hundreds of hours invested in Anaconda testing, perhaps 1/2 not related to Btrfs, over ~8 years. I would like answers to these questions. -- Chris Murphy