Re: Xorg vs Xfree86
Matt Turner <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Sep 2009 09:38:41 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.axp.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Alexey Chupahin<[email protected]> wrote: > > BTW, > After Xorg crashed on my Permedia-2 card, > I installed Xfree86 manually instead of Xorg to my 164SX with > Gentoo couple days ago. > I forget that it is the my old 21164PC processor - I just think > somebody replace the processor to any 21264 - it became really > faster in times against Xorg. > And it is stable. > I can view filmes now in MPEG4/AVI with 800x640 without any > problems. > GNOME -2.24.x is usable again. (I do not remeber the time when > Gnome was usable under Xorg on my 164SX) > Resume: Xorg - is down. > Alpha owners, you all really lost your CPU power using this > doze. I'm glad everything is working for you. > I think we should replace doze xorg to Xfree86 in Alpha/linux > distributions > May be we can do some view in this way? Definitely not. XFree86 is a step in the wrong direction. You should join #alpha on irc.freenode.net and help us fix X.Org before the pending release. Thanks, Matt