Re: dosbox question
mattias <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.blinux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
eh? dosbox with braille? Den 2016-04-23 kl. 15:24, skrev Tom Masterson: > Thanks. Dosemu wolkers enough to tell me what I needed to know. > > Tom > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 23, 2016, at 05:20, Tony Baechler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 4/21/2016 2:07 PM, Tom Masterson wrote: >>> I have an old dos thing I was trying too look at to find out something. I >>> tried running dosbox but found it unreadable with my braille display. Is >>> dosbox usable or is there a better way to look at dos programs? >> >> I agree with Larry that dosemu is a better option. It works fine with Speakup, so presumably should work with Braille from the Linux console. Yes, DOSBox is useful, but you'll need a DOS screen reader. Since everything is virtual, you'll have to find a way to redirect the virtual serial port, etc to the Braille device. I doubt very much that it supports USB for Braille, but you might be able to redirect the virtual COM1 to it. If you need a fully functioning DOS environment, dosemu is definitely the better option, but to use all features, you'll need a DOS screen reader for it also with the same limitations. Another option is a virtual machine running FreeDOS. You could use Qemu or KVM to route the virtual serial port. It largely depends on what DOS thing you're referring to and how muc h complexity you want. I should warn you that DOSemu in Debian does something weird with X11 fonts and doesn't work for me with Vocal-Eyes anymore. I tried making sure it wasn't using X but! ! > with no luck. > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list