Re: A new tts on Linux
Jude DaShiell <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.blinux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What I wrote about earlier referred to the kali linux distro for security. If what is under discussion here, then that writing does not necessarily apply. On Thu, 3 Nov 2016, Jackie McBride wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 23:42:36 > From: Jackie McBride <[email protected]> > Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <[email protected]> > To: Linux for blind general discussion <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: A new tts on Linux > > Any reason u call it kali, since that's the name of a distro dedicated > to security? IMO, it creates a great deal of confusion. > > On 11/3/16, Kyle <[email protected]> wrote: >> To be brutally honest, I think some of the Flite/Mimic voices sound much >> much better in English. Even Espeak, though not a "natural" voice, >> definitely sounds less, um, like it's got something firmly entrenched in >> its cheak or something, and it even has somewhat better inflection with >> the right settings, and even the default inflection isn't so bad, >> meaning it doesn't hit unusually high notes at the wrong times as this >> demo voice is doing. Perhaps this proprietary voice is good in French, >> but there's no way I would pay anything close to the asking price for >> the English variant, especially since I wouldn't even be paying for a >> recognized free open source license. >> Sent from time >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Blinux-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list >> > > > --