Re: A challenging question?

shellworld.net doesn't need to have mutt unless you need output saved in 
your shellworld.net account.  When I go out to google, it's direct from 
my computer to their mail server and that's over a web only connection 
too.  mutt is a command line application so anyone wanting high graphics 
is going to be seriously disappointed.  It all comes down in text.

Only reason I made that offer is mutt takes time to study how to 
configure it and this would give you a leg up.  if your office computer 
is windows, mutt won't work.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote:

> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 01:59:33
> From: Karen Lewellen <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <[email protected]>
> To: Linux for blind general discussion <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: A challenging question?
> 
> Fine, but logging into  gmail is not the problem.  It is gathering in a 
> fashion that reflects how these e-mails appear in a low graphics environment. 
> That and the volume.
> Whatever the program is, does it exist at shellworld?  I have no other access 
> to Linux at all, save for my office shell with dreamhost.
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
>> tmux, not tmox.
>> 
>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>
>>>  Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 23:42:30
>>>  From: Karen Lewellen <[email protected]>
>>>  Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <[email protected]>
>>>  To: Linux for blind general discussion <[email protected]>
>>>  Subject: Re: A challenging question?
>>>
>>>  Hi folks,
>>>  I do wonder if we have tmox at shellworld.
>>>  Actually, the printer friendly  edition of emails at google will produce
>>>  fine text, and yes I can save the file with the p function.
>>>  The challenge is, since this is court evidence, I must gather  likely a
>>>  couple  hundred of them.
>>>  Something to petition the judge regarding.
>>>  Thanks for the ideas,
>>>  Kare
>>> 
>>>
>>>  On Thu, 19 Jan 2017, Tim Chase wrote:
>>> 
>>> >  On January 19, 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>> > >  Asking just in case there is a simple tool  for this process.
>>> > >  I need to capture several emails from my gmail account.  It is
>>> > >  critical that the e-mails appear, as they do for me, not how they
>>> > >  might in standard view, i. e. with alt tags  visible for anyone.
>>> > >  Lynx, links, and e-links are the browsers I wish to use for this, I
>>> > >  would imagine the alt tag would be different even if I had access
>>> > >  to say Firefox.
>>> > >  Depending on the target audience, a couple ways come to mind:
>>> > >  1) In lynx-the-cat, use the "p" command to print to a file.  This is
>>> >  basically the same thing as doing a "lynx -dump" on a page.  In
>>> >  links-the-chain and elinks, you can use "File, Save formatted
>>> >  document" to get the same sort of results.
>>> > >  2) use your terminal emulator's copy/paste functionality to select
>>> >  the content of the gmail session in lynx/links/elinks session
>>> > >  3) fire up GNU screen or tmux, launch Lynx inside, browse to your
>>> >  email, and then use the "scrollback" functionality in screen/tmux to
>>> >  copy text off the screen into a buffer, then use the screen/tmux
>>> >  scrollback-paste functionality to dump it into a file.
>>> > >  4) use the "script" program to record the entire session with
>>> >  timings:
>>> > >   $ script --timing=gmail.timings gmail.script
>>> >   $ lynx https://gmail.com
>>> >   (do your thing)
>>> >   $ exit  # leaves the "script" recording session
>>> > >  this will give you two files "gmail.timings" and "gmail.script" which
>>> >  you can then play back with
>>> > >   $ scriptreplay gmail.timings gmail.script
>>> > >  Now on to comparing:
>>> > >  #1 is easiest choice with some of the best results for the use-case
>>> >  you are describing.
>>> > >  #2 & #3 are basically a screen capture of the text that you can dump
>>> >  into a text file, but don't include any coloration or playback (like
>>> >  #1).  Also, these usually end up being one screen at a time with
>>> >  full-screen curses applications like lynx/links/elinks, so if your
>>> >  text is more than one page, it's a bit annoying to capture, save,
>>> >  scroll, capture, save, repeat. But they do work for any terminal
>>> >  application, not just relying on browser-specific functionality.
>>> > >  #4 gives an exact replay of the options, but requires a terminal that
>>> >  understands it.  If you're playing back on the same terminal where
>>> >  you recorded, this has no issues.  But if you're trying to share it,
>>> >  there may be hurdles involved.  Also, while a quick test here
>>> >  suggests that script doesn't capture passwords in certain modes, it
>>> >  might if recording a lynx/links session, so I'd either only share it
>>> >  with someone you trust with your gmail password, or redact the file
>>> >  before sharing it.
>>> > >  And if you haven't had a chance to play with screen/tmux, they're
>>> >  incredibly powerful and well worth the investment of time (I
>>> >  personally prefer and recommend tmux, but both are substantially
>>> >  similar to the end user).
>>> > >  As usual, my verbose replies are likely overkill, but hopefully give
>>> >  you some options to explore. (grins)
>>> > >  -tim
>>> > > > > > > > >  _______________________________________________
>>> >  Blinux-list mailing list
>>> >  [email protected]
>>> >  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> > >
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Blinux-list mailing list
>>>  [email protected]
>>>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blinux-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blinux-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
>

--