Re: A challenging question?
Karen Lewellen <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:59:46 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.blinux.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I have no issues using gmail now. since I am only either doing it from shellworld, or in the case of my office, dreamhost, my direction is fine laughs. Was late last night when I wrote, will flesh out this one time use of alpine as Larry discusses. Personally i do not care for alpine, but my use is based on dreamhost, who may not fully understand the program themselves, smiles. Hopefully the person scamming this list looking for a date will not add to the amusement...I do not do girls. kare On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Tim Chase wrote: > On January 19, 2017, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> Actually, the printer friendly edition of emails at google will >> produce fine text, and yes I can save the file with the p function. >> The challenge is, since this is court evidence, I must gather >> likely a couple hundred of them. > > Ah, that changes the game. I'd go the route that Hart mentioned of > connecting to Gmail via IMAP and slurping your mail locally which > gives you the actual message body including all the headers. From > both a forensic perspective and a "gather them up to submit for > evidence" perspective, having the actual messages (rather than a > print-out) is the ideal. > > If you want bidirectionality (continuing to use Gmail while also > having things local and keeping them in sync), I recommend something > like "offlineimap" or "mbsync" to pull/sync the mail locally. Once > it's local you can use a number of tools to manipulate the mail, > whether Alpine or Mutt to read it interactively, or "notmuch" to > index it for fast searches. And since they're just text-files, they > can be copied, linked, zipped up, and sent to whomever you need. > > -tim > > > > _______________________________________________ > Blinux-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list > >