RE: Please provide stable 6.1 Release

"Eric Garza" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.ccm.general
Message-ID <000001c427ad$4ea52dd0$6401a8c0@garzaxp>
Last word on this issue. Richard, I hear what you're saying. I certainly
appreciate the work that has been done to date. But the fact is, there
are stable releases of 6.x CCM software not publicly available, and what
Redhat is doing demonstrates a frustrating trend, forcing companies and
individuals to purchase licenses for companion products to stay up to
date with open source software. I am not begrudging anyone their right
to make a living, but that is not in keeping with the spirit of open
source software.

At a minimum, point releases could be made available via the ftp site,
with some accompanying release notes, which is stated in the FAQ. Redhat
is saying, please beta test our software, but you don't get to reap the
benefits of stable releases unless you cough up some green. Quid pro quo
Clarice!!

--
Eric Garza

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Li [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Eric Garza
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [redhat-ccm-list] Please provide stable 6.1 Release

http://rhea.redhat.com/faq.html#release-policy

Eric Garza wrote:

> I know that the only public distribution of version WAF/CCM/Portal 6.1

> is via nightly builds, but 6.1 appears to have been released 
> officially, is there any chance we can download that stable release, 
> similar to the 5.x release? I mean is this open source software or 
> what? Do I have to buy Enterprise to get this open source package? The

> cmdev sourceforge project only has 5.x code.
>
>  
>
> I finally downloaded Aplaws+ to get a stable 6.1 release and all is 
> well, alas portal is not integrated. Just wondering.
>
>  
>
> --
>
> Eric Garza
>





-- 
Redhat-ccm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-ccm-list
Archives: https://www.redhat.com/pipermail/redhat-ccm-list/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.