Re: Please provide stable 6.1 Release

The nightly build script wasn't running because of a lock file that had
not been deleted.  I have removed it and verified that the script is
working.  So, expect to see new packages up after tonight's cron job.

Cheers
-- Dennis

On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 11:10, Dennis Gregorovic wrote:
> Thanks for pointing this out.  I didn't realize they were down.  I'll
> get this fixed now.
> 
> -- Dennis
> 
> On Fri, 2004-04-23 at 09:18, Tuan Nguyen wrote:
> > While we're discussing this issue, I'm just wondering what happened to 
> > the nightly builds? They have disappeared for the past 4-5 nights? Is 
> > there something wrong?
> > 
> > Tuan.
> > 
> > 
> > Jun Yamog wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > It seems that this discussion has been done several times in the past. 
> > > There has been some positive changes, but none are dramatic changes.  I
> > > think it can be seen that the initial interest level is there, but the
> > > continued interest level is not there.  You can just see the list or the
> > > wiki in sf.net.  If you look at it there are a lot of installation
> > > inquiries, etc.  Not much about non installation stuff, people have
> > > stayed here are most often are those that did pay for RH support.  There
> > > are only a few real volunteers around.  So I think the place is not yet
> > > conductive enough for open source development.  The code is open source,
> > > but not much can be said with the community.  Maybe RH can look again at
> > > its strategy since after more than year I don't think we have grown the
> > > community that much.
> > > 
> > > Welcome Eric Garza, we hope that your new blood can put some fire again
> > > on the community.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jun
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 00:21, Eric Garza wrote:
> > > 
> > >>John's point about fostering an active development community gets to the
> > >>heart of my issue and the apparent disconnect between Redhat and open
> > >>sources developers out there. We don't have 1 billion in revenues and
> > >>open source software provides us with cost effective options. I am going
> > >>to evaluate the software through Redhat trials and will ultimately pay
> > >>up if the features justify the investment. 
> > >>
> > >>I think there is an excellent opportunity for Redhat to take some market
> > >>share by making CCM/Portal more openly available given the some of the
> > >>lame open source Portal solutions out there. 
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>Eric Garza
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 


-- 
Redhat-ccm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-ccm-list
Archives: https://www.redhat.com/pipermail/redhat-ccm-list/