Re: ccm/cms 6.1 production release
"Daniel P. Berrange" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.ccm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 12:48:08PM -0400, Tuan Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understand that the production release of ccm/cms 6.1 is not available
> publicly, however, the current public release of APLAWS+ (under GPL)
> seems to be based upon ccm/cms 6.1. Why are there both a "production"
> quality release for 6.1 and at the same time a "nightly" version? I'm
> quite confused with the current state of the releases. Please clarify.
The current APLAWS+ release is based on an unofficial[1] release build
of CCM 6.1. The nightly builds are practically the same as the official
internal 6.1 release - just a few bug fixes have been added since release.
So at this point in time there is little difference between these three,
but of course it won't neccessarily stay like this for long - nightly
builds are the development, not stable, tree after all....
Dan.
[1] ie I built the Core & CMS packages a couple of days before the
final internal 6.1 release.
--
|=- Daniel P. Berrange - [email protected] -=|
|=- Red Hat, 338 Euston Road, London, NW1 3BT. +44 (0)7977 267 243 -=|
|=- -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
--
Redhat-ccm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-ccm-list
Archives: https://www.redhat.com/pipermail/redhat-ccm-list/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAj+GBs9/3Qn07lQURAjjJAKCZb8CqCgIA1jmoHuW5W6kvAYcY4gCgpZw+ 8PUzH25IWmOJrcutO2I8LqM= =Yg4U -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----