Re: glibc-2.3 compatibility issues with Maya and NetBackup

Peter Bowen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 14:04, Lars Damerow wrote:
> We're testing Red Hat 9 for deployment on our desktop workstations, and have
> bumped against two showstoppers--Alias|Wavefront's Maya and Veritas NetBackup
> don't work. This is a big problem for us.
> 
> This seems to be caused by the well-publicized changes to the use of errno in
> the new glibc. Here's what Maya says when I try to run it:
> 
> lars@luna: rh9_glibc % /usr/anim/3rdparty/maya/bin/maya
> /usr/anim/3rdparty/maya/bin/maya.bin: relocation error: /usr/anim/3rdparty/maya/lib/libFoundation.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
> 
> I'm confused, though, because maya.bin is linking against what I'm assuming is
> a compatibility version of glibc:
> 
> lars@luna: rh9_glibc % ldd /usr/anim/3rdparty/maya/bin/maya.bin | grep libc.so
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x42000000)
>
> Is there some hack or patch that I can make to get these things working until
> Alias|Wavefront and Veritas fix their code and/or linking? I have a really
> strong desire to get Red Hat 9 on our desktops (we're currently way back on
> 7.1) and need to get past this issue as soon as I can.

Have you applied all the glibc erratas?  I think one of them fixed some
compatibility symbols.

Thanks.
Peter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.