Re: Distro originated from RH9
John <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306042159420.25312-100000@gw.computerdatasafe.com.au> |
On 4 Jun 2003, Vladimir Djokic wrote: > > Good day, > People. I'm trying to build distro originated from RH9. I've managed to > modify anaconda, but have a few other questions (legal): > > (1) kudzu says something like: 'Hardware probing tool...(C) 2003 Red > Hat, Inc.'. I'm fine with leaving this Copyright notice, if it's legal, > or should/can I change it to (if I modify the code) to something like: > 'SVCDHF Linux hardware prober... (C) My company'? Leave existing copyright notices in place. Ad yours if you feel your changes warrant it. > > (2) I'm in process rebuilding RPMs, but can I change data in spec > files, like description: '...these are SHVCDF init scripts...' (insted > of "...Red Hat init scripts...'), and other data that is related to Red > Hat, Inc.? Read RH's trademark guidelines. Whatever you create, you can't describe it as Red Hat Linux, and maybe you can't say it's "derived from RHL." AFAIK using packages unaltered is fine. -- Please, reply only to the list. Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb