Re: Insure++ Alternatives

Philip Wyett <[email protected]> 04 Aug 2003 20:37:41 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.devel
Message-ID <1060025860.2563.2.camel@rh9>
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 20:18, Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS)
wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am not sure whether this is the correct list for my post, if not
> excuse me.
> 
> For the runtime testing of C++ applications for memory corruption and
> memory leak detection ,
> we are currently using Insure++ from PARASOFT . Can anyone suggest me an
> Open Source alternative
> for the Insure++ tool?  How far the open-source tools are capable of
> doing the job as compared to Insure++?
> I don't know much about Insure++ , but I thought of exploring
> open-source alternatives for this tool. So please
> try to elobarate on whatever you suggest. ..!! Any useful information is
> highly appreciated..
> 
> Thanking you all in advance....
> 
> Pradeep

Hi,

A nice open source alternative is valgrind.

http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/

Regards

Philip Wyett

-- 

AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) or Yahoo Messenger: PhilipWyett

Email: [email protected]

Website: http://www.philipwyett.dsl.pipex.com

Public key: http://www.philipwyett.dsl.pipex.com/gpg/public_key.txt

--
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/LrYEKb/cIyIfGioRAixZAJ90N2R9QSeEKIwCm62M3z3K1u29jgCfTyAd
o9f6EyyMQtWdp6FwJPmkrMo=
=vgFX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----