Re: Insure++ Alternatives
Philip Wyett <[email protected]> 04 Aug 2003 20:37:41 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1060025860.2563.2.camel@rh9> |
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 20:18, Sadanapalli, Pradeep Kumar (MED, TCS) wrote: > Hi , > I am not sure whether this is the correct list for my post, if not > excuse me. > > For the runtime testing of C++ applications for memory corruption and > memory leak detection , > we are currently using Insure++ from PARASOFT . Can anyone suggest me an > Open Source alternative > for the Insure++ tool? How far the open-source tools are capable of > doing the job as compared to Insure++? > I don't know much about Insure++ , but I thought of exploring > open-source alternatives for this tool. So please > try to elobarate on whatever you suggest. ..!! Any useful information is > highly appreciated.. > > Thanking you all in advance.... > > Pradeep Hi, A nice open source alternative is valgrind. http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/ Regards Philip Wyett -- AOL Instant Messenger (AIM) or Yahoo Messenger: PhilipWyett Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.philipwyett.dsl.pipex.com Public key: http://www.philipwyett.dsl.pipex.com/gpg/public_key.txt --
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/LrYEKb/cIyIfGioRAixZAJ90N2R9QSeEKIwCm62M3z3K1u29jgCfTyAd o9f6EyyMQtWdp6FwJPmkrMo= =vgFX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----