Re: Call for Yum Frontend
Jason Knight <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
seth vidal wrote: >Thanks for the kind words. > > No problem :) >look on the fedora-config-list and you can see some of that discussion >there. > >I've been rewriting considerable portions of yum with this in mind. > >it takes time, b/c I'm trying to keep from making a bunch of the same >mistakes and getting rid of the 'download all the headers' requirement >that everyone seems to hate. > >-sv > > Now that I am subscribed to the Fedora Config list I see that there isn't much traffic so can you summarize for us what has and has not been done? Also what we can do to help you? shrek-m wrote: > absolutely correct, > we are missing since a very long time a true gui *package management > tool* > which gives us all the possibilities from > rpm, (rpmbuild), up2date, yum, apt, ... > > - add/remove new rhn-sources: yum, apt, dir, ... > - install/update/freshen/remove single/multiple packages via ftp, > http, dir, ... > - list/search installed/not-installed packages > - ... > i could not find these improvements. > afair in system-config-packages fc2t1 were some new features, > but it seems the these were removed So are the redhat devs still working on this or should we (the users) take it upon ourselves to start a project on sourceforge? -- Jason Knight Fedora Core 2 Test 3 *x86_64* -- fedora-test-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list