Re: Call for Yum Frontend

Jason Knight <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
seth vidal wrote:

>Thanks for the kind words.
>  
>
No problem :)

>look on the fedora-config-list and you can see some of that discussion
>there.
>
>I've been rewriting considerable portions of yum with this in mind.
>
>it takes time, b/c I'm trying to keep from making a bunch of the same
>mistakes and getting rid of the 'download all the headers' requirement
>that everyone seems to hate.
>
>-sv
>  
>
Now that I am subscribed to the Fedora Config list I see that there 
isn't much traffic so can you summarize for us what has and has not been 
done? Also what we can do to help you?

shrek-m wrote:

> absolutely correct,
> we are missing since a very long time a true gui *package management 
> tool*
> which gives us all the possibilities from
> rpm, (rpmbuild), up2date, yum, apt, ...
>
> - add/remove new rhn-sources: yum, apt, dir, ...
> - install/update/freshen/remove single/multiple packages via ftp, 
> http, dir, ...
> - list/search  installed/not-installed  packages
> - ...

> i could not find these improvements.
> afair in system-config-packages fc2t1  were some new features,
> but it seems the these were removed 

So are the redhat devs still working on this or should we (the users) 
take it upon ourselves to start a project on sourceforge?

-- 
Jason Knight
Fedora Core 2 Test 3 *x86_64*


-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.