system-config-securitylevel and named services
Paul Nasrat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There are quite a few requests for service by name/service description for s-c-securitylevel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128541 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124161 There is also this related thread here: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2004-July/msg00551.html I thought I'd throw a couple of thoughts up for discussion. Earlier anaconda would pass a service name + :tcp to lokkit, I'm reluctant to add that back for s-c-securitylevel as it's not quite correct. Would an add/remove rather than textbox for additional services make better sense? In which case should we have a predefined list of more well known services, with addition of custom ports (possibly with descriptive text or just showing both port and service name from /etc/services). I wonder if we will want to have better "service definition" for service publishing via howl. Paul -- Fedora-config-list mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list