Re: Apacheconf HIG

Vladimir Djokic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On уто, 2004-09-07 at 13:12 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> Bugzilla is possibly a better place for that as it doesn't get lost.  In this case discussion around the bug can be focussed here.  Create an RFE - link to the screenshots on a website somewhere and table the discussion.
> 
> > what i'm all talking about :) if that turns out to be ok, i _WILL_
> > improve apacheconf UI, and all other fedora sys tools that use glade,
> > then i can move to those that don't (i'm also a programmer:)
> 
> It'd be helpful for you to share on common issues, etc in addition to posting
> patches/new glade files.  To ensure future development is more HIG aware.  Your
> help/patches are welcome, hopefully we could document some of this up into a
> smaller Fedora s-c-foo HIG gotchas doc or something.
> 
> Paul
> 

	this is current apacheconf http://www.gnome-ppp.org/fedora/apache-
conf.old.png

	this is what i would start doing http://www.gnome-
ppp.org/fedora/apache-conf.hig.png

	first, change all glade ui's to hig compliance, and then we can seat
and talk to make some string more human.

	bye,
	vladeck.

-- 
"There's no room for ideals in this mechanical place. There has to be
passion. "



-- 
Fedora-config-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.