| Newsgroups |
gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
The Mailbox javapenguin is currently unavailable.
It is in deactivated state and is not receiving mails.
Your message reads:
Received: from rover.electric.net (unverified [216.129.90.19]) by ucmmail.com
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.3.11) with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:10:50 -0400
Received: from emrelay.onebox.com by rover.electric.net with host-route (Exim 4.34)
id 1C5QZV-0002WY-3u
for [email protected]; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:10:49 -0700
Received: by emcmailer; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:10:49 -0700
Received: from hormel.redhat.com ([209.132.177.30])
by rover.electric.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1C5QZT-0002V9-4G
for [email protected]; Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:10:47 -0700
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])
by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 644E17398A; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
[172.16.52.254])
by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i89FAiHX022696 for <[email protected]>;
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:10:44 -0400
Received: (from mail@localhost)
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i89FAiE26804
for [email protected];
Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:10:44 -0400
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com
[172.16.58.1])
by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i89FAh326800
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:10:43 -0400
Received: from [172.16.59.25] (verve.devel.redhat.com [172.16.59.25])
by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i89FAfbl020585
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:10:41 -0400
From: Brent Fox <[email protected]>
To: Discussions about configuration tool development <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <1094495480.2949.22.camel@ricky>
References: <1094495480.2949.22.camel@ricky>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2)
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 11:10:43 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-loop: [email protected]
Subject: Re: system-config-dhcp
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: Discussions about configuration tool development <[email protected]>
List-Id: Discussions about configuration tool development
<fedora-config-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives/fedora-config-list>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list>,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
Sender: [email protected]
Errors-To: [email protected]
X-Origin-IP: 209.132.177.30
X-SPAM-Status: NO, -0.2 / 4.0 DCC [0.0] BAYES [0%]
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by sophos
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 14:31, Steven R. Baker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Okay, this is a notice to let folks know that Mike Hoffman and I are
> working on a DHCP configuration program, which I'll call
> system-config-dhcp (or system-config-dhcpd?).
>
> The first "milestone" will include basic configuration for a DHCP server
> to serve ranges to one subnet.
>
> I've looked over the system-config-* programs to see if there are any
> standards to adhere to, or tools to use, and I haven't really found
> any. So, before I get too far in this, I want to find out if there are
> any pointers anyone has. My hope is for this tool is that it will come
> standard in future FC releases, and I want to make sure that it matches
> up with the other tools as closely as possible.
>
> The other thing that will come of this project is that I will be
> documenting the "common practises" that I am informed of, and the basic
> method of writing such an application.
>
> It is my intention to get working on the other "useful but nonexistant"
> tools listed at http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/config-tools/ as soon
> as this one is mature enough to be used in simple scenarios.
>
> Brent, perhaps you'd care to comment or discuss this on irc (srbaker on
> Freenode and OFTC) as I have some ideas for these types of tools that
> you may find interesting; and your input would be especially helpful.
Steven,
I should have sent this email a lot sooner. I have moved to a
different department inside Red Hat and I will no longer have time to
work on the config tools project. I need to update the Fedora web pages
to reflect this change.
Cheers,
Brent
>
> Thanks,
> -Steven
>
--
Fedora-config-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
--
Fedora-config-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list