Re: new s-c-soundcard in rawhide
dragoran <[email protected]> Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:54:57 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel,gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:58:49AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > >>> 1) I'm supposed to pick a PCM device and know what the difference is >>> between: >>> Intel 82801DB-ICH4 >>> Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - MIC ADC >>> Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - MIC2 ADC >>> Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - ADC2 >>> Intel 82801DB-ICH4 - IEC958 >>> intuitively? (Moreover, I'm asked to do this in two different places.) >>> >> These names depend on driver writer, if you don't know just use the >> default. Optionally I can move it to some "advanced" settings. >> > > Is there a case where a normal person would want the non-default? > > > >>> 3) How is the user supposed to know whether to use kudzu, /proc, or HAL >>> detection? Why are they even *given* a choice??? >>> I'm failing to see what sort of usage case this is solving. Surely this >>> should all just work? >>> >> It's because: >> kudzu detects only internal cards (kudzu doesn't detect USB cards well), >> > [...] > >> Proc detects all cards fine, but it isn't "preferred" and works only >> when drivers are succesfully loaded. >> > [...] > >> HAL detects only cards with correct /sys entries (so it doesn't detect >> > [...] > >> So, when HAL detects all devices fine, I'll remove proc&kudzu. >> > > Why not, in the meantime, do them all? Or do HAL first, and if that fails, > kudzu, and if that fails, proc? (Possibly with a "look for more" button?) > > > this would be a good idea something like no soundcard found should I try an other method to detect? yes -no -- fedora-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list