Re: BitTorrent based update mechanism

"Al Sutton" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.configuration
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Elliott,

Thanks for the feedback.

The problem with a single large download file is twofold;

1) You loose the ability to have different sources for different patch sets.

2) (As you've mentioned) it's not universally supported by all BT clients.

I followed the discussions relating got multi-tracker capabilities and Bram
(The author of the offical client) was very anti-it, so again it's unlikley
it'll be supported by all clients.

I'll definatley put a note in for v2 of the paper though.

Regards,

AL.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Elliott Wilcoxon" <[email protected]>
To: "Discussions about configuration tool development"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: BitTorrent based update mechanism


> Nice job, it's like you read my mind.  However, I suggest that instead
> of a million small .torrent files sent as part of the update summary,
> one large one be sent.  The large one would have the meta-info for a
> completely updated system.  The End User's client then just downloads
> the specific updates that the user wants (several clients support
> downloading selected files in a torrent, instead of the whole thing).
> Unless, of course, the size of the larger .torrent is prohibitive; I'm
> unaware of how .torrent filesize scales with the number of files that
> the .torrent contains information for.  There could be other issues with
> one large torrent and/or many small torrents, something you might want
> to research for v2 of the paper?
>
> Also, to prevent the whole thing coming down should the tracker become
> unavailable, I suggest that the multi-tracker spec be used (
> http://home.elp.rr.com/tur/multitracker-spec.txt ).  AFAIK, the most
> recent official Bittorrent client doesn't support it, but many
> unofficial open source clients support it, so I don't forsee its
> inclusion as a huge problem.
>
> Elliott Wilcoxon
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I've written a short paper on how BitTorrent could be used in an update
mechanism (i.e. a method that coule be integrated into up2date). This should
help those who have bandwidth problems with the amount of downloads they
get(such as the Fedora Legacy project).
> >
> > I've put the paper online at
http://www.argosytelcrest.co.uk/papers/btupdate.html and I'd appreciate any
comments anyone has on the ideas.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Al.
> >
> >
>
>
> -- 
> Fedora-config-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
>
>


-- 
Fedora-config-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.