Re: F45 Change Proposal: Grub EFI For Confidential Computing (self-contained)

Timothée Ravier via devel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Message-ID <178229786028.3477179.6454685438783429643@mailman01.rdu3.fedoraproject.org>
Neal Gompa wrote:
> From the Fedora Cloud point of view, I am generally supportive of
> this. I would like to see other common filesystem modules re-added
> though (particularly btrfs, but it also probably makes sense to re-add
> xfs and ext4).

This contradicts the main goal behind this package which is to include as few modules as possible to reduce the attack surface and thus the need for updates. When using UKIs, we only need support for the FAT filesystem that is used to store them in the ESP.
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.