Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: F45 Change Proposal: Grub EFI For Confidential Computing (self-contained)

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 04:47:43PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026, at 4:31 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> 
> > Just for the one edit I made (removing the above line), I took Marta's
> > (one of the proposers) permission to do it.
> 
> Thank you, that's the same as the owners changing it for me.
> 
> >> The given paragraph and other statements on the forums confuse me as well.
> >
> > If something else is confusing, please spell it out, so the authors can
> > amend / rephrase it.
> 
> With the removal of the paragraph it's no longer necessary to clarify what it
> was based on. 
> 
> Previously it was mentioned on the forums that it was based on the input from
> the systemd maintainers [1] which *was* confusing as both on the forums and
> in this thread (part of) those same maintainers have said that to not be the case.

I talked about this with people during devconf.cz and apparently this
was a misunderstanding based on conflation of upstream maintainers,
Fedora maintainers, and RHEL maintainers. Knowning that, I can see
that the sentence was true from a certain point of view.

Anyway, new features in Fedora sd-boot *are* possible, so it's good
that this sentence was dropped.

Zbyszek
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new