Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for help: Future of the Fedora i3 Spin in Fedora Linux 45

On Tuesday, June 30th, 2026 at 15:41, Przemek Klosowski via devel <[email protected]> wrote:

> and attempt to address them IN WAYLAND: for instance, people miss the
> multi-window statefullness and ability to re-constitute complex
> multiwindow layouts... or the issue of middleware libraries you mentioned.

  At what point would Wayland simply become a second, distributed
version of the X11 protocol by adding these features? Each protocol
has their downsides, and upsides. Why should I improve Wayland
compositors for instance, rather than create a new protocol from
scratch, along with a reference implementation, that way, these
problems can be avoided from the start? I don't know if adding to
this complexity, and making each individual client/DE more
monolithic, would be part of my personal plans.

  This is getting to be too off topic. I think a new email thread
should be started somewhere (although I don't really know where).
I'm not willing to get smote again by the Fedora gods.


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new