Re: F45 Change Proposal: oo7 Secrets Service Provider (system-wide)
Samuel Sieb <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/30/26 11:47 PM, Bilal Elmoussaoui wrote: > Hi, oo7 author here Your quoting is a little broken. >> GNOME supports multiple keyrings. Will this support multiple keyrings? On > upgrade, how will secrets be migrated if multiple keyrings are used? Will > migration be easy if the GNOME keyrings are not unlocked by PAM (because > they have a different passphrase than the account, for example). > > The new daemon supports multiple keyrings, auto unlock through PAM and if the password is not provided through PAM, then the user is prompted to unlock them the moment you interact with them. > > How, if at all, will saved passwords in GNOME Online Accounts (goa) be > affected? > > same as above, that uses secret service dbus API, it just works. This answer is unclear. Are you saying that oo7 will use the existing keyrings automatically? -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new