Re: Distribution conditionals in spec files
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 11:42:30AM +0200, Konrad Kleine wrote: > With the current architecture we're also giving much more back to the LLVM > community because we link our daily snapshot reports on github to upstream > PRs and issues so things are more transparent and people can react quicker > and fixup things in LLVM upstream. You could say that they see if they > break Fedora which wasn't possible before. Because of this short delay of a > day or so, we have better quality and little to no crunch time when a new > release is out. That is a good point. I think adding conditionals for upstream CI and upstream builds should be explicitly allowed and even encouraged. By creating such upstream-downstream cooperation we make upstream stronger and Fedora more relevant. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new