Re: Proposal: gate all stable release updates on rmdepcheck

Neal Gompa <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Message-ID <CAEg-Je85w8bUhtkqA5w=pBmrazy+fFDZ8EDDm70BBeYVNGYE9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 12:56 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 11:16:13PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 11:05 PM Adam Williamson
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks!
> > >
> > > I want to formally propose an idea that has been kicked around a bit
> > > informally lately: gating all stable release updates on the relatively
> > > new rmdepcheck reverse dependency static checker. This would include
> > > Fedora and EPEL updates.
> >
> > ... you have my bow!
> > ... and my axe!
>
> Yes, I am in favor too.
>
> > In general I think this is a good idea, and I would also think it
> > would be a good idea for rawhide and branched. Failures could always
> > be waived, and in case of "soname bump rebuild that is incomplete
> > because something doesn't build" that would be a perfectly good reason
> > to do so - and it would make it explicit that the packager who waived
> > the failures took responsibility for that breakage - and provide
> > documentation for it alongside the update. That said, stable releases
> > and EPEL is likely less controversial, so starting with that sounds
> > good too.
> >
> > And while I kind of agree that the Change process does not seem to be
> > *great* fit for this, but similar changes *have* gone through the
> > Change process before (like
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages ). Should
> > a system-wide change (lower case intentional) like this require at
> > least *some* kind of signoff from FESCo?
>
> I suppose it might be a good idea to get a fesco ack here.
> But also, I think this should be flexable so if it's enabled and some
> big problem appears it can be disabled again until thats addressed, etc.
>

I think as a global change, I would prefer it to be submitted as a
change to fesco for at least an ack, if not a formal proposal. It is
effectively changing the contract for how things work.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.