Re: Proposal: gate all stable release updates on rmdepcheck
Vít Ondruch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dne 06. 07. 26 v 23:16 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 11:05 PM Adam Williamson > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi folks! >> >> I want to formally propose an idea that has been kicked around a bit >> informally lately: gating all stable release updates on the relatively >> new rmdepcheck reverse dependency static checker. This would include >> Fedora and EPEL updates. > ... you have my bow! > ... and my axe! > > In general I think this is a good idea, and I would also think it > would be a good idea for rawhide and branched. +1 including Rawhide / Branched Vít > Failures could always > be waived, and in case of "soname bump rebuild that is incomplete > because something doesn't build" that would be a perfectly good reason > to do so - and it would make it explicit that the packager who waived > the failures took responsibility for that breakage - and provide > documentation for it alongside the update. That said, stable releases > and EPEL is likely less controversial, so starting with that sounds > good too. > > And while I kind of agree that the Change process does not seem to be > *great* fit for this, but similar changes *have* gone through the > Change process before (like > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages ). Should > a system-wide change (lower case intentional) like this require at > least *some* kind of signoff from FESCo? > > Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEjuEMC4xF8PxsGhoUDOCe55kXuHwFAmpPqDkFAwAAAAAACgkQDOCe55kXuHzz +w/8CoUrVsiYWkekMWE7pDmWPp/j+ERnw+aR51bHotKjmXgs+jK+Rx6T9T/VTjX6UPh39X1YHy2d wcgtplEasit8KpH88Pihl65liZOtSbzaisLD4wCJ/lj+NQ8BUvzJenYrScRwmKOAHLWzYuRrMavH wfKCVNHzwevl30/T+YdQrtLjqvMjqN36ickXwYWGJapyAWDE2SzqZazwIzDgvaSjEoXYmsHMlAqt 6FmD8l0JhZC4A+8f8Iy1PikU4lZDAFTFitbb8rM8tC5a0vc67moksllbWIRTJfCJsIhhZ5Tc7muU mFwVYa1L+Fg6zjkj4uZ3/QrRKqSkPNaWwqzfWvj86Le70pBU7BybkrLGxDcBDhVqZA2alJ71EvbP WedbBinSCrCRfUk7vox/gjDbPRwQW9cLsYzdFIU8jd0VYM8S5Zql/JOKxSc3KFx52aONY8ii5vgN yGr+F1gMdsoYESoJQbYsVDUD2V4WA//9JuvrrfH5rsQh/uHgK0gBDpR0BVLE9TyFJ8Pat3fqxVmg hij7RUZ7js6U0pDMYwFbnq+j8T+102mVjU/dPjs0yMKgkAzQhT/JVrs9BYlw0IMy6rn1nqYj1BWn zY1kKQMsy58eWblVYwVcSrCeiEfjTMEdq+T5wN8Rm6My2euktxUx59kB5lw3YcABTwK3+W+EyZo4 /3c= =3MLh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----