Re: Proposal: gate all stable release updates on rmdepcheck

Vít Ondruch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dne 06. 07. 26 v 23:16 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 11:05 PM Adam Williamson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> I want to formally propose an idea that has been kicked around a bit
>> informally lately: gating all stable release updates on the relatively
>> new rmdepcheck reverse dependency static checker. This would include
>> Fedora and EPEL updates.
> ... you have my bow!
> ... and my axe!
>
> In general I think this is a good idea, and I would also think it
> would be a good idea for rawhide and branched.


+1 including Rawhide / Branched


Vít


>   Failures could always
> be waived, and in case of "soname bump rebuild that is incomplete
> because something doesn't build" that would be a perfectly good reason
> to do so - and it would make it explicit that the packager who waived
> the failures took responsibility for that breakage - and provide
> documentation for it alongside the update. That said, stable releases
> and EPEL is likely less controversial, so starting with that sounds
> good too.
>
> And while I kind of agree that the Change process does not seem to be
> *great* fit for this, but similar changes *have* gone through the
> Change process before (like
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages ). Should
> a system-wide change (lower case intentional) like this require at
> least *some* kind of signoff from FESCo?
>
> Fabio

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=3MLh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.