Re: i686 removal - easy win set
Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:42:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dne 18. 07. 26 v 9:06 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 18/07/26 03:02, Michal Schorm ha scritto: >> On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 2:32 AM Mateus R. Costa >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This brings it to my question: since to me I am almost sure nobody will ever install the x86_32 version, although it's perfectly buildable, what prevents me from, as a packager, to simply disable it for only that package? >>> >>> Is there a specific policy I should be aware of? >> Hi Mateus, >> The current policy actually encourages package maintainers to drop the >> leaf i686 packages on their discretion: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval >> You can go for it right now. >> >> >> This thread's goal is to coordinate a larger independent effort - here >> I seek validation of my analysis, and assistance with realization. >> >> > Perhaps it's time to file a new proposal and make i686 builds off by > default? > > If we have to add ExcludeArch to 3.400 packages + those which already > exclude i686 builds, how many packages are left if we invert the logic > and add some magic macro to enable i686 build? +1 If "inverted" way is technically possible, I would very much prefer it. Even if majority packages should be initially explicitly enabled for i686, I think that is much better approach, because after the i686 builders are removed, we will be forced to do the cleanup. Not leftover `ExcludeArch: %{ix86}` will stay behind. BTW this likely mean that at the same time, the already existing `ExcludeArch: %{ix86}` should be removed, because they won't have any purpose (although I am sure that some maintainers might use these platforms also for other distributions). Vít -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEjuEMC4xF8PxsGhoUDOCe55kXuHwFAmpd31gFAwAAAAAACgkQDOCe55kXuHzA dQ//RrXQc7gi00peL4T2Xi0AfNCTFWsiRnVp+whl5TwB5N7Ul/cMbhsfSbBQknD5mndUhQA8qFn5 dKtez7hmiwmswGaShZBtCS6NUKrK9w7x53+9syPY03JYPiaalGcPEeP/wDASBKdNYxjQTzcAH1Vi gKOg+VkqR5vr8G65KLHFBr6kFmcQjgZ3gRX2lZsaHhYIQGkONP9lB2pn9rMOS3KcGPWRSvJmOzSP yY61D6karstWCvfs0LJALGnJ/QFYw10YrFA85u9niz/0EqPNPFtQYfqAJhoyj5rJysElj4WWHuzE L3ZN4ZPl3HVDjS8r3PAOnQcsh7+syewRXnJ91VQTFPhn1qd35sTMQ/AjwbgL5e4bTTVylDjkbSjS DozRGzwdorspLDgNX2q5cXkvNVGKsxSUkl3DyPsDafBfpQj8r6IeD+CS0oPJTkDKIgxS507TlmPS DuJj0mH+1+j+1WLHiHzYqSvL/25PbmFRtlhb278QBgC6FlAhgB5KIYZ4ST7kL6E6rYvW/f0odcpR 4cqqZuZLnHgHndItxAGYIWKDPgOd/9ruOc+vogGeO2YXHhLzi7IMy3Z9LNf/mS/64nU93lB8jOLl WDnT8odHijVbzgk6B+uIPs1hPl7Gf4dDDhJgveeJuFdGwHUpNH4nH+U3lWHe9lpSXgzBb5OdoxMK btw= =XDZw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----