Re: F45 Change Proposal: Sequoia opengpgverify (self-contained)

Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:13:55 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 05:05:42PM +0000, CS Sushi Man via devel wrote:
>   Symbol names like this are not covered by any ABI that I know of,
> including the x86_84 ABI that I have linked. I suggest you to be
> careful when using this term with such confidence, otherwise, you
> will look bad to engineers who know what an ABI is. ABIs are
> practically synonymous with assembly language, and compiled machine
> code, since this is the only level of abstraction where ABIs
> actually matter.
> 
>   Please refrain from using terms that you don't understand. I see
> Neal's usage as a genuine mistake. I see your usage as
> overconfidence.

Please look up the term "library ABI", especially WRT symbol
visibility.

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
PGP key:        https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115  C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)