Re: F45 Change Proposal: Disable in Kernel Crypto Userspace API (Phase 1) (self-contained)
Ondrej Kozina via devel <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 24/07/2026 12:19, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:56:22AM +0200, Ondrej Kozina via devel wrote: >> >> - No Adiantum in userspace crypto libraries currently supported by >> libcryptsetup. The fallback via dm-crypt will again need CAP_SYS_ADMIN. >> Affects LUKS2. > > Is there anything blocking addition of these to openssl, or is it merely > that no one has requested it historically ? (Perhaps naively) I would > think that openssl ought to be supporting all of the cipher/mode. I really can't say for sure. I'd only guess people did not care as there was an alternative via AF_ALG, at least in libcryptsetup use case. But adding new things in libraries take time and a _lot_ of effort. You can read about 2+ years journey of Argon2 KDF in openssl[1][2], if you'd like :) Of course, it will be better to have it in userspace crypto libs. /shrug O. [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12255 [2] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12256 > > With regards, > Daniel -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new